Skip to content

AI model category

Reasoning AI models

For work that needs careful thought: analysis, planning, long documents and agents that take several steps.

  • 10 models

Reasoning models spend extra computation thinking before they answer. That makes them better at multi-step problems, such as reviewing a contract against a playbook, planning an agent's next action or checking figures across several documents. It also makes them slower and more expensive per request than fast general-purpose models.

Most business systems use a reasoning model only for the steps that need it, and a faster model for everything else. We test both on real examples before choosing.

Reasoning

All reasoning ai models

Reasoning

Claude Fable 5.1

Anthropic

The top tier of the Claude family, for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agent work, priced above Opus.

  • Anthropic
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic

Anthropic's recommended starting point for most serious work: long-running agentic coding and knowledge work, with a 1M token context window.

  • Anthropic
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
General purpose

Claude Sonnet 5

Anthropic

Anthropic's balance of speed and intelligence: a strong everyday model for assistants, document work, tool calling and coding.

  • Anthropic
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Google

Google's most advanced Gemini model for reasoning, software engineering and agent work, reading text, images, audio, video and PDFs. Available as a preview.

  • Google
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

GPT-6 Astra

OpenAI

OpenAI's most capable model, built for the hardest end-to-end work: complex reasoning, coding, computer use and research.

  • OpenAI
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
General purpose

GPT-6 Sol

OpenAI

The middle model of the GPT-6 family, positioned for complex coding and agentic workflows at a mid price level.

  • OpenAI
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
General purpose

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

DeepSeek's default, best-value model: open weights under MIT, image input, tool calling, JSON output, optional thinking and a 1 million token window.

  • DeepSeek
  • Open weights
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek

DeepSeek's model for demanding reasoning and agent work, with thinking effort levels, tool calling, JSON output and a 1 million token window.

  • DeepSeek
  • Open weights
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

Qwen3.8-Max

Alibaba Cloud

Alibaba's current Qwen flagship for long autonomous coding and professional work, with image and video input, tool calling, JSON Schema output and a 1 million token window.

  • Alibaba Cloud
  • Vision
  • Tool calling
Reasoning

Grok 4.7

xAI

xAI's current flagship for coding, agent tasks and knowledge work, with image input, tool calling, structured outputs, reasoning effort levels and a 500K window.

  • xAI
  • Vision
  • Tool calling

How to choose

How to choose in this category

Start with the hardest example you have, not the average one. If a fast model already handles it well, you do not need a reasoning model. If it fails, try a reasoning model on the same example and compare quality, time and cost per request.

Check how the provider controls thinking effort. Several models let you set how much reasoning to spend per request, which helps keep cost and response time under control.

Keep exploring

Start a project

Tell us what you want to build. We will show you a faster path.

Send a short brief. We reply with questions, a suggested plan and an estimate you can compare with other offers.

Your privacy choices

We use necessary storage to run this site. With your permission we also use Google Analytics to see which pages help people, and load maps from Google. You can change this at any time. Read the cookie policy.